The word amoral is the term we frequently use to indicate that something or someone does not have or present a sense of morality, that is, that the actions, behaviors, that they display, lack a moral purpose at all, there is a complete absence of the moral system that is normally ingrained in people.
That or that which lacks a moral sense
As a consequence, we use the word that concerns us to refer to the absence in this case of morality, it is that it is constructed with a to at the beginning, that in linguistic matters it has the effect of expressing what is contrary.
Human beings, having the capacity for reflection, is that we can apply it to evaluate what is right or wrong, that is, whether or not it welcomes a righteousness or moral value.
Morality: doing good will make us better and happier people
Morality proposes that if we act appropriately, doing good, we will be better and more perfect people than if we do not, while, when this inclination is constant and is maintained over time, we will be able to enjoy a longer existence. elevated, and of the well-being that does good report.
Doing good always implies making a commitment to it, for which it will take perseverance and effort, and to be able to resist any temptation to do the opposite, that is, evil.
The influence of education on the development of morals
On the other hand, morality is closely associated with the formation of people, that is, it is necessary to educate people in this sense, and this obviously must happen at an early age, and the responsibility is in charge of the parents, or of those who are responsible for the education of a minor.
Later, that education will continue in the school in the same sense, but it always begins and ends at home, that is why it is very important what is proposed in this space and the models that are observed and promoted there.
Faced with the succession of a certain event we can react and act in different ways, because we are free, however, the disposition of morality will allow us to discern what is right or what is, but of course, we will do it based on the morality that we have internalized And learned, for example, is that we talk about the relevance of training.
Normally, for a child to understand that something he did is wrong, for example, not lending a toy to a pair that does not have one, we must apply a sanction that will have the purpose of teaching him that what he did is not right, so that in the same situation, in the future, you can act differently and you can lend the toy to your friend.
Only in this way can we teach a child what is right and what is not, and help him internalize moral values.
Amoralism: philosophical theory born in the 19th century and which maintains that people's behavior must be analyzed independently of good or bad
On the other hand, the word amoral is used to indicate everything that is linked to amoralism, a philosophical theory that was born in the XIX century , at the urging of philosophers like Max Stirner and Friedrich Nietzsche , and that as a singular maxim proposes that the behavior of the human being is an independent question of evil or good, and therefore should not be analyzed based on these.
Somehow, the amoral proposal stands as a alternative moral in which reason and what makes the happiness of each individual rule, because the idea is basically to reject social conventions such as uses and customs, traditions.
In no way is this tendency opposed to the good, as on many occasions it was suggested, but in reality what it proposes is something simple and far from any inconvenience, and that is that people live according to their will, and in order to what makes them happy.
One of the synonyms most used at the behest of the term at hand is that of immoral, a word that we also use regularly to account for that or he who manifests himself contrary to morality and good customsHowever, it is possible to make a distinction between the two synonyms, since when we indicate that someone is immoral, it will be because they do not act in accordance with current moral precepts, and therefore in that context their behavior will be seen as inconvenient, while someone amoral, By not having a moral, he will not be able to qualify his actions as good or bad.
