The word forensic has a very recurrent use in the field of law since in this way the Medical professional who is working within an investigating court and who then within it is especially concerned with intervening in cases and situations that that court investigates and that require by their nature the official certification of a doctor.
For example, the forensic doctor is the professional who will determine the causes and the time of death of an individual. Thanks to his professional training, he will be able to identify certain characteristics in the victim that will make him elucidate these data..
Meanwhile, the information that the coroner provides, after an exhaustive analysis of the body, turns out to be of great relevance in order to discover the culprit in those cases where he is unknown.
There is practically no case in which there has been a murder or an injury and a forensic doctor does not contribute his knowledge, vision and analysis as an expert, whether official, representing the state, or on a party, representing the accused party. It is usual that whenever there is an official expert there is one from the party who will verify the procedure and, if feasible, will object to the results presented by the official expert.
In the investigation stage as well as in the trial, either the accusing party or the defense, will request the presence on the stand of the expert who will provide the conclusions reached after conducting a detained and exhaustive analysis of the subject in question. The suitability that a priori is attributed to the forensic is what will tip the balance in the decision of a court, because being an expert, a hyper trustworthy source, their presentations will be accepted as true.
The coroner carries out his activity in what is known as forensic Medicine, which is the part of medicine that focuses especially and solely on establishing the origin of the injuries that a wounded person presents or the cause that led to the death of a person, as we indicated above lines already.
